talk · Thursday 24 September · 11:35–⁠11:50 · SAL C

From 1.5 Billion Raw Queries to AI-Ready Biodiversity Data: Human-AI Collaborative Curation Pipelines in Pl@ntNet

Alexis Joly · From Mobilizing Data to AI-Ready Knowledge: Infrastructure for Multimodal Biodiversity Data

Recording time 3:55:57–4:11:08Open on Vimeo ↗

Summaries and key moments are machine-produced. Check the recording for the speaker’s exact words.

The short versionPl@ntNet's human–AI pipeline filters a vast, noisy stream into two GBIF datasets and training data, with separate branches for opted-in human-validated and automatic occurrence-only data.

Overview

What this was about

Alexis Joly described the curation pipeline that turns Pl@ntNet's 1.6 billion raw, highly opportunistic image queries (from about 20 million users a year, including house plants, tattoos, people and sensitive content) into AI training data and GBIF occurrences. Every image passes a main model trained on about 25 million human-validated images, which includes 'reject' classes. He called that reject classifier the hardest part and an editorial choice. Opt-in public observations enter human curation with weighted majority voting, where each user's weight reflects expertise estimated by an EM algorithm. Other observations contribute only automatically filtered occurrences above a strict confidence threshold (<0.01% error) and a wildness classifier to GBIF. He warned about feedback loops in which users follow AI errors.

Why it matters. Opportunistic AI apps are among the largest sources of biodiversity observations. How they filter, validate, licence and publish data determines the quality of downstream models and species distribution analyses.

Key ideas

In the room

  • Pl@ntNet is 15 years old, has about 20 million users a year, 1.6 billion raw observations and about 20,000 plants per hour.
  • The raw stream includes cultivated and potted plants, plants on clothing and tattoos, humans (e.g. classroom sessions), non-living objects, nudity and drug-related images.
  • The main model, trained on ~25 million human-validated images, outputs species, genus, family, diseases and reject classes. The reject classifier is the hardest and involves editorial choices about user intent.
  • Branch 1: observations users opt in to share publicly (CC BY-SA, named) are curated by weighted majority voting, with user expertise estimated by an EM algorithm based on the number of species a user can recognise.
  • Validated data retrain the model regularly, and old queries are reprocessed.
  • Branch 2: non-shared observations contribute only occurrences (no images) above a per-model threshold with <0.01% error; about 150 million remain after this filter.
  • A wildness classifier (trained on anthropised context and the app's cultivated tag) and WCVP level-2 country flora filtering remove cultivated plants before GBIF publication; two GBIF datasets result.
Jump in

Notable moments

In their words

Transcript

Automatically generated captions can contain mistakes, especially in names and technical terms. Times are relative to the room recording.

Read the transcript ↓
Loading transcript…
Programme abstract

From 1.5 Billion Raw Queries to AI-Ready Biodiversity Data: Human-AI Collaborative Curation Pipelines in Pl@ntNet

Alexis Joly

Large biodiversity platforms collect massive volumes of opportunistic observations that are valuable for ecological research and AI model training. However, transforming these heterogeneous user contributions into trustworthy and reusable biodiversity data remains a major challenge. Pl@ntNet currently processes more than 1.5 billion user queries consisting of plant images and associated metadata submitted by a large international community. Only a small fraction of these data ultimately become AI-ready training data (~25M images) or research-grade occurrences shared with GBIF (~2.5M images).

We present the human-AI collaborative curation pipeline used in Pl@ntNet to progressively transform raw multimodal observations into fitness-for-use biodiversity datasets. The pipeline combines automated filtering, community moderation, collaborative taxonomic revision, image-quality assessment, and governance constraints. Automated filters remove non-plant content, malformed observations, duplicate or low-quality images, and sensitive media. Taxonomic quality is refined through a collaborative validation process combining AI predictions, community interactions, and expert feedback across species galleries and observation streams. Community moderation signals help identify problematic observations, including off-topic or unreliable content. Dataset construction also incorporates licensing and provenance constraints, excluding observations that cannot be redistributed or reused.

We further show how downstream objectives require different curation levels. While AI training datasets prioritize taxonomic consistency, visual relevance, and diversity, GBIF publication requires stricter filters on geolocation, cultivation status, metadata completeness, and interoperability standards.

Submitted to the conference programme before the talk, so the talk itself may differ.