talk · Thursday 24 September · 11:51–⁠12:03 · SAL B

Provenance, Lineage, and Auditability in AI-Driven Biodiversity Image Workflows

Xiaojun Wang · AI-Readiness Metrics and Metadata for Biodiversity Data

Recording time 3:26:56–3:36:29Open on Vimeo ↗

Summaries and key moments are machine-produced. Check the recording for the speaker’s exact words.

The short versionTwo persistent-identifier links per derived image, parent and batch, are enough to preserve auditable lineage and pipeline context for AI-processed biodiversity images, even outside the repository.

Overview

What this was about

Xiaojun Wang presented how the Fish-AIR repository records provenance for AI-derived fish images produced mostly by external pipelines. Fish-AIR holds just over 400,000 source images from 67 institutions plus about 306,000 derived images (bounding boxes, segmentations, landmarks), and each derived record carries a parent ARK (its direct input image) and a batch ARK (the processing run), so following parent links reconstructs lineage back to the specimen image. Batch records (a class with 14 terms in the Fish-AIR vocabulary) store shared run metadata once, and ARKs, parent and batch references travel in exported CSV and RDF downloads. Automated checks of about 359,000 parent links and 763,000 batch links found all resolvable, enabling researchers to trace odd results and compare model performance across collections or batches.

Why it matters. As AI pipelines generate derived media at scale, lineage that survives export is essential for reproducibility and for diagnosing whether model errors come from source material or processing.

Key ideas

In the room

  • Fish-AIR serves the Biology-Guided Neural Networks and Imageomics projects; derived outputs are produced mostly by external teams' pipelines.
  • Snapshot: just over 400,000 source image records from 67 institutions and 7 source collections; about 306,000 derived images, including roughly 290,000 bounding box images, 42,000 segmentations and 27,000 landmark images.
  • A specimen image can pass through bounding box, segmentation and landmark tasks; each output is a separate record in a separate batch, and file names cannot preserve relationships.
  • Each record has its own ARK; derived images also store a parent ARK and a batch ARK; source images have no parent, and harvested images reference harvest batches.
  • 21 batch records describe AI pipeline runs by the Tulane and Virginia Tech teams; batch is a class with 14 terms (pipeline, institution, creator, project, date, supplement path, code repository, etc.).
  • The largest batch contains almost a quarter of a million outputs; shared metadata is stored once on the batch record.
  • Downloads include multimedia and batch CSVs with ARKs, citation information, term definitions and an RDF model (Fish-AIR vocabulary version 3).
Jump in

Notable moments

In their words

Transcript

Automatically generated captions can contain mistakes, especially in names and technical terms. Times are relative to the room recording.

Read the transcript ↓
Loading transcript…
Programme abstract

Provenance, Lineage, and Auditability in AI-Driven Biodiversity Image Workflows

Xiaojun Wang

As the role of artificial intelligence in biodiversity research becomes increasingly significant, the traceability of AI-processed image data has become critical to ensuring research reproducibility, data reusability, and workflow auditability. However, in biodiversity image collections, persistent identifiers are still primarily limited to original specimens. Derived images generated through AI pipelines lack systematic provenance tracking, and their chain of lineage is broken once the data leaves the repository. This talk presents FishAIR's provenance model as a case study of how a production biodiversity image system extends persistent identifiers beyond original specimens to AI-derived images, maintaining an unbroken chain from digitized collection images through bounding box, segmentation, and landmark processing. At the core of this model is the treatment of processing activities as citable first-class objects: each “batch” representing a set of image processing runs is treated as a traceable workflow event. It is assigned a unique ARK identifier recording the responsible institution, pipeline type, software configuration, and parameters. This design ensures that provenance information is not merely optional metadata but an inherent property of every derived image, without relying on external workflow management infrastructure. By maintaining this chain, FishAIR enables data users to trace the origin and transformation history of any training image and identify which processing stage or source collections those images originated from when model performance varies across different data subsets. The framework further supports transparent and auditable AI biodiversity workflows by preserving lineage across all stages of image derivation and reuse.

Submitted to the conference programme before the talk, so the talk itself may differ.