talk · Tuesday 22 September · 08:45–⁠09:00 · SAL B

Restricted access species data in Finland

Will Morris · To see or not to see - that is the question. Managing restricted access data (RASD)

Recording time 17:29–23:52Open on Vimeo ↗

Summaries and key moments are machine-produced. Check the recording for the speaker’s exact words.

The short versionFinBIF applies an authority-maintained restricted species list to all mediated data, but lacks a standard way to share what it restricted and why.

Overview

What this was about

The recorded portion of Will Morris' talk explains how FinBIF applies Finland's government-maintained restricted species list (first published 2015, updated 2025, a little over 150 species) to all data it mediates. Restrictions range from full concealment to generalisation to 1-100 km grids and may be limited by region, season or specific sites; field notes are withheld and multi-record events are unlinked so co-observed species cannot reveal locations. Restricted data are published through a public portal and API, while a logged government authorities portal gives unrestricted access and a request service lets others ask providers for restricted data. He noted that GBIF-bound Darwin Core Archives only use informationWithheld and dataGeneralizations, and that much of the restriction information has no standard home yet.

Why it matters. A national-scale implementation showing both the mechanics of restricting data (generalisation, unlinking events) and the gap that motivates the TDWG RASD extension.

Key ideas

In the room

  • A working group of government authorities (e.g. Finnish Environment Institute, Parks and Wildlife) maintains the list of restricted species and the restrictions to apply; the list was first published in 2015 and updated in 2025.
  • FinBIF conservatively applies these restrictions to all data it mediates, not only government data.
  • The list has just over 150 species and mirrors taxonomic bias: about half are birds (about a third of Finland's breeding birds), nearly all bats, some reptiles, amphibians, butterflies and a moth, and many vascular plants (largely orchids).
  • Restrictions include full concealment or generalisation to 1, 5, 10, 25, 50 or 100 km grids, possibly limited to parts of Finland, seasons (breeding, wintering) or specific sites.
  • Field notes that might reveal locations are withheld, and multi-record events are unlinked so an unrestricted co-observed species does not reveal a restricted one.
  • A public portal, API and bulk download service (with persistent identifiers) serve restricted data; a separate logged authorities portal gives unrestricted access to government employees; others can use a data request service mediated between users and providers.
  • Data published to GBIF use Darwin Core informationWithheld and dataGeneralizations, but the sensitive species checklist is only an Excel spreadsheet and information about restricting entities and access routes is not shared via any standard.
Jump in

Notable moments

In their words

Transcript

Automatically generated captions can contain mistakes, especially in names and technical terms. Times are relative to the room recording.

Read the transcript ↓
Loading transcript…
Programme abstract

[No sound] Restricted access species data in Finland

Will Morris

The Finnish Act on the Openness of Government Activities (621/1999) necessitates that species data in Finland is not made publicly available if it would endanger the protection of the species or area in question. The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility (FinBIF) is a service for researchers, government and the public. The data harmonised in FinBIF's data warehouse includes the results of national monitoring programs, scientific collections and citizen science projects. FinBIF is the body primarily responsible for managing Finnish restricted access species data (RASD). FinBIF coordinates an expert panel, the Public Authorities Working Group, that maintains a list of taxa that require some level of data restriction. The Public Authorities Working Group determines the level of restriction and circumstances under which it should be applied. Each taxon included on the list must be subject to a concrete threat: persecution, harvesting, or disturbance. The list was first compiled in 2015, and a comprehensive update was carried out in 2025. Minor updates are made as needed. There are currently 155 listed taxa. Species data that is mobilised by FinBIF has restrictions applied on being harmonised in the data warehouse, before being made publicly available. The unrestricted data is made available in a parallel data warehouse that can only be accessed by registered users from statutory public authorities. Other data users may make a request for access to restricted data. Requests are fulfilled via a data access platform on a case by case basis with the consent of the data providers or relevant proxies. We outline the system for handling RASD in Finland and discuss how current and proposed biodiversity data standards may aid data providers and users.

Submitted to the conference programme before the talk, so the talk itself may differ.